English Base

Test 012

Reading Practice: The Return of the Bicycle Lane

Reading Text

At half past seven the avenue fills with a steady stream of cyclists, most of them heading for the offices beyond the river. A year ago this was a four-lane road where anyone on a bicycle was an exception. Since the new track opened in spring, the morning flow has grown to nine hundred riders an hour, and by eight it has become almost continuous.

A year of planning produced a modest-looking change: one traffic lane and a strip of parking went, and a two-way track was laid along the northern kerb, separated by a low concrete edge. Two junctions were narrowed, so turning vehicles now cross the path at a sharper angle. Having measured the street beforehand, the team expected speeds to fall.

Drivers have adapted more slowly. In the first weeks, vans delivering to the bakery regularly stopped in the track, and turning cars often failed to look right. By the third month such conflicts had fallen by half. Footage suggests that most drivers now check the mirror twice before turning. Not once did the team record a serious collision, though near misses were frequent at the start.

Pedestrians, whose interests are often assumed to clash with those of cyclists, have gained most quietly. Crossing distances have shortened, and waiting times at the two junctions have dropped by about twenty seconds. Complaints about bicycles on the footway rose briefly, then declined as the track filled. Counts at the school gate show a small but steady rise in children walking, which the team links to calmer traffic rather than to the track itself.

Shopkeepers were initially sceptical. A petition against the loss of parking collected several hundred signatures, and one hardware store predicted a fall in trade of a third. Twelve months of till data tell a duller story: takings have stayed level, and shops selling coffee or bread report more customers between seven and nine. Parking, it turns out, was never the main reason people stopped; crossing the road easily may matter more.

Six months of measurement have produced a picture that is reliable in outline but incomplete in detail. Speeds have fallen, cycling has roughly tripled, and the tendency for conflicts to cluster at two junctions is clear. Whether the figures will survive a wet winter is unknown, and the team has been careful to say that one season cannot settle the argument. The evidence supports a modest conclusion: a street can be rearranged gradually, and people will adjust, provided the change is legible.


Comprehension Test

Question 1. What does the first paragraph mainly show about the avenue?

✗ IncorrectThe text says the opposite: a year ago it was a four-lane road, and a cyclist there "was an exception".

✓ CorrectThe paragraph sets "an exception" against a flow that "has grown to nine hundred riders an hour", so the change of status is the main point.

✗ IncorrectCars are still there; the second paragraph mentions vehicles turning across the path, and only one lane was removed.

✗ IncorrectOffices appear only as a destination for riders; the text says nothing about how many of them exist.

Question 2. What does the text say about the size of the morning flow?

✗ IncorrectThe figure given is "nine hundred riders an hour", ten times larger than this option claims.

✗ IncorrectBy eight the flow has become "almost continuous", but no doubling or comparison with the following hour is mentioned.

✓ CorrectThe text states directly that the flow "has grown to nine hundred riders an hour" since the track opened.

✗ IncorrectThe passage describes a morning flow from half past seven onwards; evening traffic is never discussed.

Question 3. Why were two junctions narrowed?

✓ CorrectThe text links the narrowing to geometry: "two junctions were narrowed, so turning vehicles now cross the path at a sharper angle".

✗ IncorrectParking was taken away, not added: "a strip of parking went", and traders later petitioned against its loss.

✗ IncorrectThe sharper angle is presented as a matter of how cars meet the track; cyclists are not said to be slowed anywhere in the text.

✗ IncorrectThe track is described as running along the kerb; its width is never discussed, and no link to the junctions is made.

Question 4. What does "Having measured the street beforehand" imply about the team?

✗ Incorrect"Beforehand" places the measurement before the work, which is why a fall in speeds could be predicted at all.

✗ IncorrectThe text says the team "expected speeds to fall", so the expectation was firm rather than doubtful.

✗ IncorrectNo other city or street appears in this passage; the measurements concern one avenue across time.

✓ CorrectEarlier measurement gave them a baseline, which is exactly what allows an expectation to be formed in advance.

Question 5. What happened during the first weeks after the track opened?

✗ IncorrectThe paragraph describes cars that stayed and behaved badly, not traffic that disappeared elsewhere.

✓ CorrectBoth details are given: vans "regularly stopped in the track", and turning cars "often failed to look right".

✗ IncorrectThe text gives no such move; it only says the vans delivering to the bakery stopped in the wrong place.

✗ IncorrectNear misses "were frequent at the start"; the fall in conflicts came by the third month.

Question 6. What best explains the fall in conflicts by the third month?

✗ IncorrectNo repainting is mentioned; the explanation offered by the text concerns driver behaviour.

✗ IncorrectTraffic volumes by car are never reported; only speeds, conflicts and cycling numbers are measured.

✓ CorrectFootage shows most drivers "now check the mirror twice before turning", which is offered as the sign of a new habit.

✗ IncorrectEnforcement is not part of the account at all; the evidence cited is camera footage and counts.

Question 7. Why does the author write "Not once did the team record a serious collision"?

✓ CorrectThe emphatic opening stresses the absence of serious crashes, and the same sentence concedes that "near misses were frequent at the start".

✗ IncorrectThe mention of frequent near misses contradicts any claim of complete safety; the wording is deliberately limited.

✗ IncorrectThe team is presented as thorough, counting riders, speeds and conflicts; no doubt about its records is raised.

✗ IncorrectThere is no comparison with other streets anywhere in the passage; the remark is about this avenue alone.

Question 8. How does the text distinguish the gain made by pedestrians from that of drivers?

✗ IncorrectNo footway widening is described, and it was the drivers who lost a lane, not kept it.

✗ IncorrectCompensation is never mentioned; the benefits described are shorter crossings and shorter waits.

✗ IncorrectShops are discussed in the fifth paragraph as existing businesses; no new ones are said to have opened for pedestrians.

✓ CorrectWaiting times dropped "by about twenty seconds", whereas the drivers' story is one of adaptation to a new layout.

Question 9. Why did complaints about bicycles on the footway decline?

✗ IncorrectNo ban or rule is mentioned; the change is explained by where cyclists chose to ride.

✗ IncorrectThe footway is not described as changing at all in this paragraph.

✓ CorrectThe text ties the decline to the rising use of the track: complaints fell "as the track filled".

✗ IncorrectThe opposite is reported: counts at the school gate show a rise in children walking there.

Question 10. How did the shopkeepers react at first?

✗ IncorrectThey "were initially sceptical" and organised a petition, which is the reverse of a warm welcome.

✓ CorrectThe petition "against the loss of parking" collected several hundred signatures, which shows organised opposition.

✗ IncorrectThe trade figures come from the till data of the businesses themselves, not from a survey they commissioned.

✗ IncorrectThe shops are still trading on the avenue a year later, as the till data for the same street show.

Question 11. What did twelve months of till data show?

✗ IncorrectThe prediction of "a fall in trade of a third" is the shopkeeper's fear, and the data do not confirm it.

✗ IncorrectTakings "have stayed level" overall, so a sharp rise everywhere is too strong and simply not reported.

✗ IncorrectBusinesses selling coffee or bread "report more customers between seven and nine", not fewer.

✓ Correct"Twelve months of till data tell a duller story: takings have stayed level", while coffee and bread sellers report "more customers between seven and nine".

Question 12. What does the author suggest in the closing sentence of the fifth paragraph?

✓ CorrectThe sentence says parking "was never the main reason people stopped" and that crossing easily "may matter more".

✗ IncorrectThis is exactly what the author denies: parking was "never the main reason people stopped".

✗ IncorrectNothing in the sentence proposes restoring the spaces; the author only reports what the takings suggest about why people stop.

✗ IncorrectThe author only corrects their fear about trade; the rest of their position is not judged at all.

Question 13. What does "reliable in outline but incomplete in detail" mean?

✗ Incorrect"Reliable" gives the figures credit; the doubt concerns detail, not the accuracy of the whole.

✗ IncorrectThe contrast in the phrase is between outline and detail, not between one street and other places.

✓ CorrectThe phrase itself sets a trustworthy outline against incomplete detail, and the next sentences show which detail is missing.

✗ IncorrectThe words describe the picture the measurements give, not the layout or length of a document.

Question 14. In the last paragraph, "provided the change is legible" means the change must be

✗ IncorrectThis takes the word literally; the sentence is about how people respond to a rearrangement of the street.

✓ CorrectHere legible means readable in the practical sense: road users must be able to grasp the new layout without effort.

✗ IncorrectApproval belongs to the planning stage, which the text mentions separately; legible refers to how the change reads on the ground.

✗ IncorrectCost is not part of the argument at any point; the condition attached to adjustment is comprehension.

Question 15. What is the author's overall attitude to the redesign?

✗ IncorrectThe final paragraphs list unknowns and warn that one season "cannot settle the argument", which is not uncritical praise.

✗ IncorrectThe measurements are called "reliable in outline" and are used as the basis of the conclusion.

✗ IncorrectA judgement is stated at the end — the evidence "supports a modest conclusion" — which is a position, if a restrained one.

✓ CorrectBenefits are reported plainly, yet the winter and the single season are named as limits, which keeps the approval conditional.