English Base

Test 016

Reading Practice: Noise in the City

Reading Text

The refrigerator in a small flat makes almost no impression during the day. Its compressor hums, stops, hums again, and nobody turns to look. At three in the morning the same sound seems to fill the kitchen, and residents who have lived there for years call it unbearable. Nothing about the machine has changed; what has changed is the amount of competing sound around it. That observation explains much of what researchers now say about urban noise.

Sound is measured in decibels, a unit that compresses an enormous range into a manageable scale. Because the scale is logarithmic, ten decibels are usually heard as roughly twice the loudness, twenty as four times. A quiet bedroom may sit near thirty, ordinary conversation near sixty, a busy junction near eighty. A difference of a few units, trivial on paper, can therefore be decisive: the gap between a tolerable street and an exhausting one is often smaller than residents expect.

Loudness alone does not determine how tiring a sound becomes. Studies have shown that unpredictable noise disturbs people more than a steady sound of higher volume. A constant rumble can be accommodated, whereas sudden bangs force the brain to reorient itself, and the recovery costs attention. Control matters too: people tolerate sounds they can switch off far better than identical sounds they cannot. This tendency explains why open-plan offices generate so many complaints despite modest measured levels.

Cities have begun to answer with planning rather than prohibition. The most reliable approach is not to silence a street but to protect a quiet side of each building, so that bedrooms face a courtyard while living rooms absorb the traffic. Some municipalities have mapped quiet areas with the same care they give to parks. Evidence from several surveys suggests that access to such spaces predicts satisfaction with a neighbourhood more strongly than the overall noise level does.

A parallel shift has occurred in how the problem is described. Rather than asking only how loud a place is, researchers ask what its soundscape communicates: which sounds are wanted, which tolerated, which lost. The city becomes a piece of music residents interpret, not a container of pressure. A market's calls may be valued; a ventilation unit's drone may not be, at the same decibel reading.

Complaint figures complicate the picture. Most formal complaints concern neighbours rather than traffic, although traffic is louder for far more people. A neighbour's noise arrives unpredictably and feels personal, while a road is a shared condition nobody can be blamed for.


Comprehension Test

Question 1. What is the main point of the refrigerator example at the start?

✗ IncorrectThe text states the opposite: "Nothing about the machine has changed", so age and wear are not the issue.

✓ CorrectThe hum is ignored by day but "seems to fill the kitchen" at night, because what changed was "the amount of competing sound around it".

✗ IncorrectThe paragraph treats the night-time reaction as accurate, not exaggerated; the residents are describing a real change in what they hear.

✗ IncorrectThe kitchen is merely where the fridge stands; the text never compares rooms with one another.

Question 2. In the first paragraph, "nobody turns to look" suggests that during the day the hum is

✗ IncorrectNothing suggests the hum is treated as a fault by day: it simply "makes almost no impression" on anyone.

✗ IncorrectThe level of the hum never changes; only the amount of other sound around it does.

✓ CorrectDuring the day the compressor "makes almost no impression" and nobody reacts, since other sounds mask it.

✗ IncorrectThe residents themselves notice it at night, so the hum is not limited to visitors.

Question 3. Why does the author call the decibel scale "manageable"?

✓ CorrectThe unit "compresses an enormous range into a manageable scale", so a huge span of loudness fits into small figures.

✗ IncorrectAccuracy is not the claim; the paragraph is about compressing range, and the figures it gives are typical rather than exact.

✗ IncorrectDistance is never mentioned in connection with decibels anywhere in the paragraph.

✗ IncorrectThe paragraph does not discuss international standards or their uniformity.

Question 4. What does the author imply about how residents judge street noise?

✗ IncorrectNo measurement by residents is described, and meters do not appear in the second paragraph at all.

✗ IncorrectEighty decibels is given as the level of "a busy junction", not as something residents approve of.

✗ IncorrectThe text says a few units "can be decisive", which implies that residents do register such differences.

✓ CorrectSince "the gap between a tolerable street and an exhausting one is often smaller than residents expect", they imagine a wider gap than really exists.

Question 5. Why does unpredictable noise tire people more than a steady sound?

✗ IncorrectThe paragraph says unpredictable noise disturbs more than "a steady sound of higher volume", so loudness is not the reason.

✓ CorrectThe text says sudden bangs "force the brain to reorient itself, and the recovery costs attention", so the cost is the mental work of resettling after each interruption.

✗ IncorrectDuration is not offered as the explanation; the mechanism described is repeated readjustment after each surprise.

✗ IncorrectOffices appear later only as a place where such complaints arise, not as the source of the effect.

Question 6. Besides volume, what makes a sound easier to tolerate?

✗ IncorrectPitch is not discussed; the paragraph contrasts predictability and control, not high and low sounds.

✗ IncorrectFamiliarity is never mentioned; the key contrast is between sounds one can and cannot switch off.

✓ CorrectPeople "tolerate sounds they can switch off far better than identical sounds they cannot".

✗ IncorrectThe presence of other listeners is not part of the explanation offered in the text.

Question 7. In the third paragraph, "the recovery costs attention" means that

✓ CorrectThe phrase describes the mental effort of resuming a task after a sudden sound has pulled attention away.

✗ IncorrectThe cost described is mental effort, not an increase in the sound itself.

✗ IncorrectThe distraction is temporary; the word "recovery" implies that attention does return.

✗ IncorrectThe brain keeps reacting, and that is precisely why the cost is repeated each time.

Question 8. Which planning measure does the author describe as the most reliable?

✗ IncorrectThe author says the aim is "not to silence a street", so closing streets is not the measure recommended.

✗ IncorrectBarriers are not mentioned; the measure described concerns the arrangement of rooms.

✗ IncorrectMeasurement appears in the text as a research tool, not as the planning solution.

✓ CorrectThe reliable approach is "to protect a quiet side of each building, so that bedrooms face a courtyard".

Question 9. What do the surveys mentioned in the fourth paragraph suggest?

✗ IncorrectParks appear only as a comparison for how carefully quiet areas are mapped, not as a ranking above courtyards.

✓ Correct"Access to such spaces predicts satisfaction with a neighbourhood more strongly than the overall noise level does."

✗ IncorrectCost is never discussed; some municipalities are said to have mapped quiet areas already.

✗ IncorrectNo fall in noise levels is reported; the surveys concern residents' satisfaction.

Question 10. What change in research does the fifth paragraph describe?

✓ CorrectResearchers now ask "what its soundscape communicates", which shifts attention from level to meaning.

✗ IncorrectThe contrast between traffic and neighbours belongs to the final paragraph, which deals with complaints.

✗ IncorrectNo alternative unit is proposed; decibels remain the measure referred to in the same paragraph.

✗ IncorrectThe text favours planning over prohibition, and no shift towards bans is described.

Question 11. By saying the city is "not a container of pressure", the author rejects the view that

✗ IncorrectThe author keeps measuring sound; the objection is to treating it only as pressure.

✗ IncorrectMarket calls are offered as an example of sound that "may be valued", so they are not what the author rejects.

✗ IncorrectThe text never mentions trams or any transport policy; its examples of sound that "may be valued" are a market's calls and, by contrast, a ventilation unit's drone.

✓ CorrectThe phrase replaces the image of a vessel of harmful pressure with sound that residents interpret, like music.

Question 12. Why does the author mention a market's calls and a ventilation unit's drone together?

✗ IncorrectThe origin of the sounds is irrelevant here; the point concerns how they are judged.

✓ CorrectBoth are placed "at the same decibel reading", yet one may be valued while the other is not.

✗ IncorrectThe text says the opposite: the calls may be valued while the drone may not be.

✗ IncorrectPlanners are not said to remove either sound; the pair illustrates judgement, not policy.

Question 13. What difference does the last paragraph draw between neighbours' noise and traffic noise?

✗ IncorrectTraffic "is louder for far more people", so neighbour noise is not the louder category.

✗ IncorrectThe paragraph says "most formal complaints concern neighbours rather than traffic".

✓ CorrectA neighbour's noise "arrives unpredictably and feels personal", while a road is "a shared condition".

✗ IncorrectNothing suggests residents can switch traffic noise off; the idea of control belongs to the third paragraph.

Question 14. What does the author suggest about complaint statistics?

✗ IncorrectNothing in the paragraph supports exaggeration; the pattern is explained by unpredictability and by blame, not by residents overrating small sounds.

✗ IncorrectThe paragraph opens by warning that "complaint figures complicate the picture", which is far from treating them as the most dependable measure.

✗ IncorrectNo replacement of decibels is proposed anywhere in the text.

✓ CorrectSince "most formal complaints concern neighbours rather than traffic", the figures follow who can be blamed: a road is "a shared condition nobody can be blamed for".

Question 15. Which words best describe the author's tone?

✗ IncorrectThe tone is not amused: the examples are presented as problems that need explaining, not as jokes.

✓ CorrectThe author weighs evidence, hedges with "may" and "suggests", and avoids alarm, which suits an analytical tone.

✗ IncorrectNo blame is assigned to residents or planners; the discussion stays explanatory throughout.

✗ IncorrectThere is no personal recollection; the refrigerator serves as an illustration rather than a memory.