English Base

Test 015

Reading Practice: The Uses of Forgetting

Reading Text

The name of a former colleague will not come, though the face, the desk, and the particular way he pronounced the word "obviously" arrive intact. What follows is a familiar accusation: the memory is failing. Yet what has failed, in the strict sense, is retrieval rather than storage — the trace survives, and the difficulty lies in reaching it. Psychologists have long distinguished between availability and accessibility, and the distinction matters. Forgetting, in this technical sense, is less an absence than a selectivity: what the system declines to produce on demand.

Much of what is called forgetting proves to be interference. Learning is not the laying down of separate, sealed files; rather, each new acquisition writes across the traces already there. Prose in one language muddles the syntax of another; two phone numbers memorised in the same afternoon compete for the same retrieval cue. Researchers who have tested this repeatedly report that the competing items do not vanish but become harder to isolate. Such interference is the price of a system economical enough to reuse the same machinery for everything it stores.

Sleep does more than consolidate. During slow-wave sleep the brain appears to replay and reorganise recent experience, and — crucially — to weaken connections that carry little consequence. Were every impression retained with equal firmness, the result would be not an enviable memory but an unusable one. Here, too, forgetting is an active process with a purpose, pruning what the system judges redundant.

Seen from this angle, forgetting is adaptive in at least two respects. It generalises: losing the specifics of individual encounters allows a stable impression of a person or a category to emerge. It also motivates: the dulling of an awkward episode's detail, while troubling as a description of accuracy, is often what allows a routine to be resumed. Such claims, however, are easily overstated. Not all forgetting is functional, and the comforting language of adaptation can sanitise a genuine loss.

Where forgetting helps, the information existed and became less reachable; where it harms, the mechanism has damaged the record itself. The two are routinely conflated. Someone who cannot produce a name at a party and someone who cannot form new memories are, in ordinary speech, both forgetful, though only the second has suffered an impairment of the apparatus. Recognising the difference changes what counts as a problem: a retrieval failure calls for a different cue, a change of context, an interval; a storage failure calls for something else entirely.

The useful conclusion is narrower than the popular one. It is not that forgetting is good, still less that it should be cultivated, but that a mind which retained everything would be as handicapped as one which retained nothing, and for the same reason — neither would know what mattered. The balance is not a design we chose. It is a constraint we inherited, and the practical question is not whether to forget but what, and by what means, the forgetting is done.

Comprehension Test

Question 1. The anecdote about a former colleague's name serves mainly to

✗ IncorrectThe opening reverses this: the face, the desk and the pronunciation all "arrive intact", so what fades is not the memory of the person. The failure is located in one specific item, the name, not in recollections of people as a class.

✓ CorrectThe paragraph begins with a homely scene and immediately names the reaction to it — "a familiar accusation: the memory is failing" — before replacing that verdict with the retrieval/storage distinction. The anecdote is the material the argument works on, not a conclusion in itself.

✗ IncorrectThis is precisely the view the author sets up in order to question: the "accusation" is called familiar, and the rest of the paragraph explains why it is technically inaccurate. Nothing in the text treats the lapse as a symptom of decline.

✗ IncorrectNo return to a setting and no recovery of the name occurs anywhere in the paragraph. The scene is left unresolved while the author turns to the mechanism behind the difficulty.

Question 2. What does the author claim has actually happened when a name will not come?

✗ IncorrectOverwriting belongs to the discussion of interference in paragraph two, where new learning writes across older traces. It is not the explanation offered for the missing name, for which the text says "the trace survives".

✗ IncorrectThe author works with the opposite pair of terms: availability is distinguished from accessibility, and only the latter is said to fail here. Calling the item permanently unavailable confuses the two categories the paragraph is separating.

✓ CorrectThe text states that "the trace survives, and the difficulty lies in reaching it", and defines the event as a failure of retrieval rather than storage. The memory is therefore present but not currently reachable.

✗ IncorrectThe author corrects the accusation rather than dismissing it: something genuinely "has failed", namely retrieval. Reading the passage as a denial of any failure overstates the qualification the author makes.

Question 3. The distinction between availability and accessibility matters because it

✓ CorrectThe sentence "Psychologists have long distinguished between availability and accessibility" is followed by the claim that forgetting is "less an absence than a selectivity". Together they divide the presence of a trace from the possibility of producing it.

✗ IncorrectThe essay later concedes that in some cases "the mechanism has damaged the record itself". Turning a distinction about one kind of lapse into a universal claim ignores that concession.

✗ IncorrectThe passage is about the architecture of memory in general, not about differences between individuals. No comparison of people's abilities appears in the paragraph.

✗ IncorrectThe reference to psychologists supports the author's point instead of reporting a dispute: the terms are said to have been distinguished "long" ago. No disagreement among researchers is mentioned anywhere in the text.

Question 4. In saying that forgetting is "less an absence than a selectivity", the author means that it is

✗ IncorrectThe word "selectivity" describes how the system behaves, not a conscious choice by the person. The phrase "declines to produce on demand" is a description of the mechanism, and nothing in the text attributes intention to the rememberer.

✗ IncorrectThe whole point of the contrast is that absence is the wrong model: the trace is said to survive. Treating selectivity as non-storage collapses the distinction the paragraph is built on.

✗ IncorrectErosion would be a form of loss, whereas the author insists that "the trace survives". The paragraph replaces decay with a filtering account of what gets produced.

✓ CorrectSelectivity here means the system withholds an item rather than lacking it, which is why the withholding can be described as something the system "declines" to do. The availability/accessibility pair makes the same point in technical vocabulary.

Question 5. According to paragraph 2, learning is best described as

✗ IncorrectThis is exactly what the text denies: "Learning is not the laying down of separate, sealed files". The image of sealed files is introduced only to be rejected.

✗ IncorrectThe paragraph says the competing items "do not vanish but become harder to isolate". Erasure is ruled out; what happens is competition, not deletion.

✗ IncorrectThe bilingual example is given to illustrate interference between two systems, not a transfer process. Reducing the paragraph to that example mistakes an illustration for the general claim.

✓ CorrectThe text puts it directly: "each new acquisition writes across the traces already there". Interference follows from this overlapping, which is why the examples that follow involve competing items.

Question 6. The examples of prose in a second language and of two phone numbers are given to show that

✗ IncorrectThe two examples are listed side by side as parallel cases, with no ranking between them. Nothing in the sentence compares the durability of digits with that of syntax.

✓ CorrectBoth cases turn on proximity — "the same afternoon" — and the shared phrase "compete for the same retrieval cue". Interference is defined as this competition rather than as decay.

✗ IncorrectThe example describes syntax becoming muddled, not a comparison of speakers. Turning an illustration about systems into a claim about a group of people is precisely the kind of generalisation the passage avoids.

✗ IncorrectRepetition is not discussed in this paragraph at all, and "only" makes the claim far stronger than anything the text supports. The examples are about interference, not about preventives.

Question 7. What does the sentence about "a system economical enough to reuse the same machinery" imply?

✓ CorrectCalling interference "the price" presents it as a cost inseparable from an advantage, and the advantage is reusing "the same machinery for everything it stores". The overlap that saves resources is the same overlap that makes items hard to separate.

✗ IncorrectPace of learning is never mentioned as a remedy, and the sentence describes a structural cost rather than a correctable habit. Offering a practical fix misreads an observation about design as advice.

✗ IncorrectEconomy here refers to sharing machinery, not to throwing content away; the paragraph has just said the competing items "do not vanish". Discarding belongs to the discussion of pruning in the next paragraph and is a different mechanism.

✗ IncorrectNothing is said about storing less leading to better recall, and "necessarily" turns a trade-off into a guarantee. The author describes a cost of efficiency, not a formula for improving it.

Question 8. Beyond consolidating recent experience, sleep is said to

✗ IncorrectThe text says the brain appears to "replay and reorganise" experience, and reorganising is incompatible with preserving the original order. The addition of strict sequence is not in the passage.

✗ IncorrectNo anatomical relocation is described; the paragraph speaks only of strengthening and weakening connections. Supplying a mechanism the text never names is a common way of over-reading such passages.

✓ CorrectThe clause "and — crucially — to weaken connections that carry little consequence" marks this as the additional function beyond consolidation. The next sentence then explains why such weakening is necessary.

✗ IncorrectInterference was discussed in the previous paragraph, where no role is assigned to sleep. Here the criterion is consequence, not the timing of learning, so the two ideas have been merged incorrectly.

Question 9. The conditional "Were every impression retained with equal firmness" functions as

✗ IncorrectThe conditional is a thought experiment used in support of the argument, not a hedge about the evidence for it. Its conclusion — that total retention would be "unusable" — is presented without qualification.

✗ IncorrectThe hypothesis concerns what would follow if nothing were weakened, not what happens when sleep is missed. Sleep loss never appears in the text, so this reading imports a topic from outside it.

✗ IncorrectThe concession about costs comes later, in the sentence beginning "Such claims, however, are easily overstated". Here the hypothetical supports the beneficial side of the argument rather than limiting it.

✓ CorrectBy describing the alternative as "not an enviable memory but an unusable one", the author shows that pruning is required for memory to function at all. The inverted conditional is chosen for emphasis, giving the claim the force of a demonstration.

Question 10. The main function of paragraph 3 is to

✗ IncorrectSlow-wave sleep is named only to locate a process, and no sequence of stages is set out. Treating a scientific detail as the paragraph's purpose mistakes its means for its point.

✓ CorrectThe paragraph closes on exactly that formulation: "forgetting is an active process with a purpose, pruning what the system judges redundant". Sleep supplies the evidence for activity, and the word "purpose" replaces the idea of fading.

✗ IncorrectThe paragraph extends the argument to a second mechanism without disputing the first; "too" in "Here, too" signals addition. The essay's objections are aimed at overstatement, and they appear in the following paragraph.

✗ IncorrectThat distinction is established in the opening paragraph, where retrieval is said to fail while the trace survives. Placing it here reverses the order in which the argument is built.

Question 11. According to paragraph 4, forgetting is adaptive in that it

✓ CorrectThe paragraph names two respects: "It generalises" — losing specifics lets "a stable impression" emerge — and "It also motivates", where dulled detail is "what allows a routine to be resumed". These are the two benefits the author allows.

✗ IncorrectRevision and practice are nowhere discussed in the paragraph. The benefit described concerns forming impressions and resuming routines, not the economy of study.

✗ IncorrectThe text speaks of "the dulling" of detail, a matter of degree, and immediately warns that "Not all forgetting is functional". The word "guarantees" converts a tendency into an absolute, which the next sentence explicitly refuses.

✗ IncorrectUsefulness is not the criterion the paragraph uses; it mentions consequences, impressions and routines. This option restates the general idea of pruning from paragraph 3 in a form too sweeping for paragraph 4.

Question 12. "The comforting language of adaptation can sanitise a genuine loss" means that

✗ IncorrectThe sentence is a caution about a vocabulary, not an accusation against researchers, whose motives are never discussed. Complaints about comfort are being made about words, not about people.

✗ IncorrectThis takes the comfort as a benefit, whereas the sentence presents it as a risk to clear description. The point is that a loss may go unrecognised, not that it is lightened.

✓ CorrectThe verb "sanitise" implies cleaning something up so that its damaging character disappears from view. The sentence sits directly after the warning that "Not all forgetting is functional", so the loss in question is real and the vocabulary is what conceals it.

✗ IncorrectThe author has just used that notion to organise two genuine benefits, so dismissing it contradicts the paragraph. The objection is to overuse, not to the concept itself.

Question 13. What is the author's stance in "Such claims, however, are easily overstated"?

✗ IncorrectA rejection would contradict the two benefits he has just set out and the qualification "easily", which concerns degree. What follows limits the account rather than withdrawing it.

✗ IncorrectThe phrase "easily overstated" is an evaluative judgement in the author's own voice, and no disagreement between researchers is reported. The paragraph is argumentative, not a survey.

✗ IncorrectThe claims being qualified are those of the current paragraph, about generalisation and motivation, and sleep is not mentioned in it. Narrowing the scope to sleep confuses two separate stages of the argument.

✓ CorrectThe concessive "however" follows two endorsed benefits, and the next sentence sets a limit: "Not all forgetting is functional". Acceptance plus a boundary is the shape of the stance, and it is repeated in the essay's final caveat.

Question 14. According to paragraph 5, the two kinds of forgetting differ in that

✗ IncorrectDuration is not the criterion offered; the paragraph contrasts reachability with damage to the record. This option supplies a distinction the text never draws.

✓ CorrectThe opening sentence of the paragraph states the contrast almost in these words: "the information existed and became less reachable" against "the mechanism has damaged the record itself". Everything that follows elaborates that difference.

✗ IncorrectWho notices a lapse is never raised; both examples are described from the outside. The paragraph's contrast is about where the fault lies, not about who observes it.

✗ IncorrectInterference was the subject of paragraph 2, and time as a cause is not used anywhere in the essay. Attributing the second kind to ageing or duration substitutes a familiar explanation for the textual one.

Question 15. What follows, for the author, from the fact that "the two are routinely conflated"?

✓ CorrectThe illustration is that both people are "in ordinary speech, both forgetful, though only the second has suffered an impairment of the apparatus". Everyday usage, not the underlying mechanism, does the merging.

✗ IncorrectThis reverses the illustration: the person at the party is the one without an impairment of the apparatus. Reading the confusion as evidence about frequency also goes beyond the sentence.

✗ IncorrectThe author asks for a distinction, not for the removal of a word, and continues to use everyday vocabulary himself. Recommending abolition turns a call for precision into a demand for reform.

✗ IncorrectNo relative frequency is given for either kind, and the paragraph is about the need to tell them apart. Supplying a statistic where the text offers a definition is a change of subject.

Question 16. The list "a different cue, a change of context, an interval" is introduced to

✗ IncorrectThe author is drawing a conceptual line, not offering advice, and the list belongs to a sentence about what "counts as a problem". Turning an analytical remark into a practical tip misplaces its function.

✗ IncorrectThe sentence is built on a contrast, and the second half is emphatic: "a storage failure calls for something else entirely". Extending the remedies to both kinds erases exactly the difference being made.

✓ CorrectAll three items alter the circumstances of recall rather than the stored material, and the colon sets them against "something else entirely". The list thus demonstrates what sort of problem a retrieval failure is.

✗ IncorrectContext is one of three items in an unranked list, and no claim of primacy is made. Singling it out and ranking it imports an emphasis the sentence does not carry.
✗ IncorrectThe sentence attributes usefulness to the narrow conclusion, and the paragraph goes on to deny that the popular reading is defensible at all. Calling the popular version useful reverses the evaluation.

✗ IncorrectThe word "useful" is precisely the adjective applied to the narrow conclusion, so the option contradicts the phrase it comments on. The contrast is with the popular claim's breadth, not with the author's own usefulness.

✗ IncorrectNothing is said about readers or about how widely research is read; "popular" here describes a version of the claim. Treating it as a statement about an audience changes the subject of the sentence.

✓ CorrectA narrower conclusion is one that claims less, and the following sentences show what is being refused: that forgetting "is good" or "should be cultivated". The popular version overreaches, and the author's replacement is deliberately modest.

Question 18. What does the author mean by calling the balance "a constraint we inherited"?

✗ IncorrectThe sentence immediately before denies agency: "The balance is not a design we chose." Extending the denial to past generations simply relocates the design the author is rejecting.

✓ CorrectThe two sentences work as a pair: "not a design we chose" is followed by "a constraint we inherited". Inheritance here means receiving something rather than selecting it, which is why the practical question shifts to how the forgetting is done.

✗ IncorrectThe word "inherited" refers to a constraint shared by minds generally, not to traits passed between relatives. The essay never discusses families or individual differences.

✗ IncorrectNo change over time is described; the constraint is presented as a standing feature. Reading "inherited" as "outgrown" reverses what the word is doing in the sentence.

Question 19. Which of the following follows from the final paragraph?

✓ CorrectThe closing clause reframes the issue: "not whether to forget but what, and by what means, the forgetting is done". Since forgetting cannot be abolished, the only live question concerns its objects and its methods.

✗ IncorrectThis is refused in the plainest terms: "still less that it should be cultivated". The author's point is that forgetting is unavoidable and functionally necessary, not that it deserves encouragement.

✗ IncorrectThe text says such a mind would be "as handicapped as one which retained nothing", because "neither would know what mattered". Superior judgement is the opposite of the claim made.

✗ IncorrectThe paragraph explicitly declines to call forgetting good, so it cannot be rating the two as equally desirable. Both are described as necessary, which is a claim about function rather than value.

Question 20. Which claim would the author be most likely to reject?

✗ IncorrectThis is the author's own position in paragraph 2, where competing items "become harder to isolate". A claim he advances himself cannot be the one he rejects.

✗ IncorrectThis restates the mechanism described in paragraph 3, including the word "crucially". It is a premise of the argument rather than a target of it.

✓ CorrectThe essay's opening distinction exists to deny exactly this: forgetting is "less an absence than a selectivity", and the trace "survives". The whole argument depends on forgetting being a process with mechanisms rather than a void.

✗ IncorrectThe phrase "the two are routinely conflated" is the author's own diagnosis, and the paragraph that follows elaborates it. Agreeing with the essay, this cannot be what he rejects.
Previous Test 014 Next Test 016